Trusts & Trustees Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2009
Trusts & Trustees 2009 15(3):166-170; doi:10.1093/tandt/ttp007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Apportioning trust expenses between income and capital
Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs v Trustees of the Peter Clay Discretionary Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1441
*Michael Gibbon, Maitland Chambers, 7 Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3SZ, UK. Tel: +44-20-7406-1200; www.maitlandchambers.com
One of the central challenges faced by a trustee is frequently the balance he or she must strike between the interests of income and capital beneficiaries. This case concerned the treatment of certain expenses incurred by a United Kingdom resident discretionary trust, which the trustees had charged to income in the year 2000–01, but HMRC alleged should all have been charged to capital. It goes some way to providing clarification for trustees as to how expenses should be treated, and what evidence the courts will require to justify the treatment adopted.