Trusts & Trustees Advance Access originally published online on May 25, 2009
Trusts & Trustees 2009 15(5):273-278; doi:10.1093/tandt/ttp049
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
As you like it or measure for measure? Private foundations as an alternative to trusts
*Paolo Panico, Adjunct Professor of International Business, University of Modena, Italy and Private Trustees, SA 92 rue de Bonnevoie L-1260, Luxembourg. Tel: +352 27 48 97 31; Fax: +352 26 12 39 43; Email: paolo.panico{at}privatetrustees.net
The appeal of private foundations lies in their legal personality and that they—due to their corporate nature—are less exposed to a sham attack than trusts. But, the choice of a private foundation out of such arguments may prove to be deceptive. Private foundations managed under the founder's instructions may sooner or later fall prey to a substantive sham argument. However, private foundations may be a valid alternative to trusts wherever the personal nature of the trustee's liability proves to be problematic in the light of structuring requirements, such as in dealings with third parties.